I think everyone wants to compare a prospects to past prospects. People tend to think via analogy. If you're going to compare Newton to anyone, though, it should be a much more athletic version of Big Ben. That said, I don't see anyone who works as a perfect analogy. Slimm posited Culpepper, but Culpepper - to me - always lacked on-field intangibles, and Newton is brimming with said intangibles. Culpepper also lacked Newton's remarkable quickness.
But, I can buy a pre-injury Culpepper + intangibles + extra quickness. Of course, when you add those things, you're no longer talking about Culpepper.
But, I can buy a pre-injury Culpepper + intangibles + extra quickness. Of course, when you add those things, you're no longer talking about Culpepper.