Oh, the hairs on somebody's neck prickled at the slightest sign of Tannehill criticism (which it wasn't). Ah, hell, why not. Let's do it. Tannehill is entering his 7th season after missing 1 1/2 seasons due to serious, repeat injury that potentially impacts one of his best attributes, his mobility, after not really accomplishing much of anything. He hasn't been terrible. He hasn't been great (Oh ****, sorry! He's been positively wonderful!).
Ah, sarcasm, the last resort of someone with no point.....
We had first hand experience as to the importance of the backup QB the past two seasons. It would be proactive to prepare for the very realistic possibility of him being injured again and/or not taking it to the next level. They are opting not to do that. Fine. That indicates a high level of confidence on their part. Again, that's fine.
Is that the only thing we have first hand experience with? How about a complete lack of production from the TE? How about a mother F'n inability to stop anybody on defense, especially opposing TEs and RBs? This is a team with a ton of holes. Your suggestion is to mirror the Browns. Just grab a QB dammit!!!! My suggestion is to follow the Eagles. Build a team. They you won't need miracles from your QB. You'll have a situation where good QBs can succeed.
As for the Pats drafting QBs and trading them for profit, yes, I'd be okay with that. Obviously. Why would I not want to do that? :laugh
How many times do you think that has happened? Exactly. Have you even bothered to look into it or are you like most of the haters on the site and just spout nonsense?