OK. I might have put you in the wrong crowd. I apologise for that.
Accepted.
I still have a problem with your argument, that Argentina had all chances to win on its own power. Sure, they had a chance but so did Germany. I personally always thought that Argentina was overrated. Great players, ball control at its best, but still not dominating when it comes to score a goal (vs. good opponents). But if they were really not that good, they couldn't overcome bad beats. So couldn't have Germany. Argentina got the biggest bad beat. I think, that if everthing had gone right, they would have won (or at least got the penalty, then you never know what happens). That's why I would say that Germany was lucky and that they didn't deserve to win the game.
By the way, even if Argentina were a great team; I don't believe that a great team always has to win under any circumstance. You don't play your A-game every day, you can't overcome everything.
I don't blame the ref. I already wrote that the behaviour of most soccerplayers is unacceptable. If you would penalize diving as much as everything, there wouldn't be any doubt why a player goes down. As long as this doesn't happen, soccer will have the same discussions every weak.
But still I have to say that officiating is a big part of most sports. And it's the only part, a team can't control. It's also the only part of a game that is supposed to not determine the outcome of a game. But if it does, you have all the rights to feel treated bad and to complain, no matter how you played. And to loose a game on a non-call in a tournament, that is played only every 4th year is terrible for a team and its fans.