- Joined
- Jun 4, 2007
- Messages
- 1,984
- Reaction score
- 3,517
I think they’re happy with it, but would be happier with TaylorDidn’t you say that the MD were happy with their RB room?
I think they’re happy with it, but would be happier with TaylorDidn’t you say that the MD were happy with their RB room?
I am happy with my wife but would be happier with Taylor....Swift.I think they’re happy with it, but would be happier with Taylor
My wife would be happier with Taylor Swift but that's another story.I am happy with my wife but would be happier with Taylor....Swift.
Or the other way around? - LOLI wonder if he is hunting Trey Lance?
It's called - a start. - LOLDoesn’t make sense to me. The room needs upgrading and yet you wonder why they re-signed everyone so quickly in the Spring.
Exactly...went something like this.Aggressively might be overstating.
If we can bring in superior talent at a discount price, sure. That's just common sense.
Is the fact that we contact teams for a chat a sign of desperation? I would say not at all. More due diligence with an eye towards value, IMO.
Like I said, of course we'd love to have him but at what price?Taylor is as good as any RB in the NFL and a dream fit for this offense. It makes sense for Miami to check on his availability and to see if his contract wants make sense for the organization.
I think you go from having a sneaky-good group of RB's to one if the very best with Taylor. There's clearly value in that. How much value? Idk Taylor might be good enough for me to go against my usual stance on spending on and paying RB's.
I don't think Miami needs Taylor, but Taylor undoubtedly makes Miami scarier/more difficult to deal with.
Ask yourself this, which of our RBs would be starting for another good/great NFL team? I maintain the answer is zero.This is the debate.
How good or bad is our RB room vs going into 2024 draft pick poor.
I guess we just trust the coaches and FO.
I was both a journalist, an editor and an English major in college. I think I know what the word “aggressive” means. You are just being pissy as usual. LolThat's exactly what it means, FFS. If one comes along at a good price point, fine. That's not "aggressive".
I love how folks make up new definitions of words ..LMAO.
It’s also called “camp bodies.”It's called - a start. - LOL
I never thought about it like that before.Ask yourself this, which of our RBs would be starting for another good/great NFL team? I maintain the answer is zero.
HA! I am a dumbass!How would McD know him more than most? McD left to coach Tua 3 months before they traded up to select Trey Lance.
McD also has a system built around Tua. Lance does not appear to be a fit at all in this offense.
I don't see Lance going for more than a 4th...and the Niners would be better off keeping 3 QBs considering Purdy is coming back from injury and Darnold is becoming a journeyman. Especially considering the NFC championship debacle of not having a 3rd QB, that would be foolish for the Niners to do imo.
you couldnt be more wrongWhen you don't pick elite RBs in the draft - ever - you're gonna need to upgrade the room with trades at a much higher prices.
they all could start for KC the super bowl championsAsk yourself this, which of our RBs would be starting for another good/great NFL team? I maintain the answer is zero.