Griese is a Loser | Page 12 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Griese is a Loser

Originally posted by DeDolfan
Muck, sometimes you are just TOO gracious for MY own good!! ;)
In my haste of having to be elsewhere and already 10 minutes late, I saw the chance for a little "ribbing". I thought, "aaaHAA !! Left tackle, sack from left side, so it was the LDE !!! I realized it a few minutes later after i had shut down and said oh well, let the guys have a little fun with this and I'll "fix" it this am. Lo and behold, not much was said about it.
Anyway, I will differ with you on this on point tho. It wasn't "technically" the RDE, it WAS the RDE!! But in any case, in a hurry or not, this is a classic example of not engaging brain before putting mouth in motion !! Also, I NEVER edit any post to change what I said, even if immediately. When i do it is only to change a typo.

If you could be so gracious one more time, PLEASE accept my humble apology !!!
Click to expand...

I knew that you knew better. And I knew that you just "weren't thinking" when you posted. So there really wasn't any need for me to go in great detail explaining football to you like you were a child. :tongue: Just a little friendly reminder was all that was necessary. :D

I'll let it slide this time. But next time, you'll be swabbing the decks. lol
 
Originally posted by minus


Downfield you mean 20 yards passes?What consistency have I seen other than one game against a bad defense.

1-10 on third down is consistency? Please.
Click to expand...

They looked longer than 20 yards yesterday to me. And they've were right on target. 18/29 for 231 yards behind the worst offensive line in football ain't bad. That's 8 yards an attempt. Overall, Griese is in the Top 10 in Yards Per Attempt, whereas Fiedler is in a three-way tie for 23rd.

Griese's QB rating is 110.1. Fiedler's two best games combined (Texans and Jets) give him a 96.6. And those games came nearly 2 months ago. In the four games since, Fiedler has a combined 60.9 QB rating. And Fiedler didn't play anyone as good as the Colts.

But the bigger difference is that the boy can read a defense and sees the field well.
 
Originally posted by DeDolfan


Ummm, try .ONE667 (.1667) !!! ;) :goof: (i knew what you meant tho)
Click to expand...
4 is 2/3 of six, thats .667 dude. or doesn't your math education allow for fractions and decimals!
 
Damn.....there's ALOT of homers in this thread, isn't there?

Like someone said before....Jay's done. Get over it.

Here's something for you to chew on though....

Fumbles and fumbles lost since 2001

JF - 12 fumbles - 7 lost - 58% loss ratio
BG - 10 fumbles - 3 lost - 30% loss ratio

Rushes - Yards - YPC since 2001

JF - 119 - 490 - 4.1
BG - 89 - 278 - 3.1 (wow...a whopping 1 yard less per carry)

So how about you STFU now?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Originally posted by Muck


I knew that you knew better. And I knew that you just "weren't thinking" when you posted. So there really wasn't any need for me to go in great detail explaining football to you like you were a child. :tongue: Just a little friendly reminder was all that was necessary. :D

I'll let it slide this time. But next time, you'll be swabbing the decks. lol
Click to expand...

Oh, thank you, your "holiness" !!
Can you COACH??? :lol: 9now i can't even spell "thank" :cry: )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Originally posted by dolfan06
4 is 2/3 of six, thats .667 dude. or doesn't your math education allow for fractions and decimals!
Click to expand...

06, quit being a dumbass already! Quasimoto knows that "4 is 2/3 of six"! And yes, that is POINT six six seven......................... so what is your frikkin' point? What does that have to do with ANYTHING? So, 4 is 2/3 of 6? Six what? what the hell does 4 have to do with this? Let me count them for you, please! Jay was 4-2, ooooh, that's where the four comes in. But the whole thing was about beating winning teams. But your damn FOUR has nothing to do with anything about this. Jay was 1-5 against winning teams and Brian is 1-1. Cut it whichever you want to, but that IS .1667 and the & is a plus, DUDE !! Brian is 1-1, which is unless you NEVER attended math class is .500, or in common terms is 50%. So check your own fractions and decimals before you call someone out on them again, a'ight?? :yell:
 
Originally posted by DeDolfan


06, quit being a dumbass already! Quasimoto knows that "4 is 2/3 of six"! And yes, that is POINT six six seven......................... so what is your frikkin' point? What does that have to do with ANYTHING? So, 4 is 2/3 of 6? Six what? what the hell does 4 have to do with this? Let me count them for you, please! Jay was 4-2, ooooh, that's where the four comes in. But the whole thing was about beating winning teams. But your damn FOUR has nothing to do with anything about this. Jay was 1-5 against winning teams and Brian is 1-1. Cut it whichever you want to, but that IS .1667 and the & is a plus, DUDE !! Brian is 1-1, which is unless you NEVER attended math class is .500, or in common terms is 50%. So check your own fractions and decimals before you call someone out on them again, a'ight?? :yell:
Click to expand...
i think you're being the dumbass here. when the nfl starts logging wins and losses in 4 different categories, as to teams over .500 and teams under .500, i'll worry about it. right now its 4, count em 4 wins!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:yell: :fire:
 
Originally posted by dolfan06
i think you're being the dumbass here. when the nfl starts logging wins and losses in 4 different categories, as to teams over .500 and teams under .500, i'll worry about it. right now its 4, count em 4 wins!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:yell: :fire:
Click to expand...

J.H.C.!!!!! Who the hell cares when you'll start worrying about it. The whole point in this thread, THIS thread, not how the NFL keeps their records, was who had a better % against sub 500 teams or whatever in the hell it was. Yes, the WHOLE wolrd knows that Jay has 4, COUNT'EM, 4 wins, BFD! But like I said, that is not the point here and i'm not arguing that. Altho using the 4 win thing for jay is rather weak since Brian has only played 2 now, wouldn't you think? If Brian was 3-0, he STILL wouldn't have 4 wins would he?? :sleep: :sleep: :sleep: :sleep:
 
Originally posted by DeDolfan


J.H.C.!!!!! Who the hell cares when you'll start worrying about it. The whole point in this thread, THIS thread, not how the NFL keeps their records, was who had a better % against sub 500 teams or whatever in the hell it was. Yes, the WHOLE wolrd knows that Jay has 4, COUNT'EM, 4 wins, BFD! But like I said, that is not the point here and i'm not arguing that. Altho using the 4 win thing for jay is rather weak since Brian has only played 2 now, wouldn't you think? If Brian was 3-0, he STILL wouldn't have 4 wins would he?? :sleep: :sleep: :sleep: :sleep:
Click to expand...
you're the one that was pushin that .500 and sub .500 crap. go back and read your posts!:yell:
 
Originally posted by dolfan06
you're the one that was pushin that .500 and sub .500 crap. go back and read your posts!:yell:
Click to expand...

Actually, it was somebody else. I just jumped into the fray. It doesn't make one difference either way and there's too many pages and posts to go back thru just to prove or disprove a pointless point. :)
 
I don't understand?

Originally posted by dolfan06
gotcha!;) :tongue:
Click to expand...

Having followed all your posts, where on earth did the 'gotcha' come from? Just wondering?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom