You know who has played surprisingly well? Evan Boehm.
Deiter is s backup, draft a THUMPER. Prince is developmental. If we draft Tua I would think Wirfs is part of that package.Is this correct? By the number of likes maybe it is. Is anyone of the group of Prince, Dieter, Calhoun salvageable? At least back up?
You know who has played surprisingly well? Evan Boehm.
You're a dud.
Not impressive yet, but this class is very much incomplete, and I always consider UDFA's quasi draft picks.
Round 1 - Not super impressive yet, but solid like the rest of the class imo.
Round 2 - I liked the moves, we get an EXTRA 2nd for next year, plus Rosen on the cheap for a few years. Rosen has been disappointing so far, but he is talented and we needed a talented young player like him at that position, even if he only ends up being a back up.
Round 3 - Deiter, doesn't look so hot.
Round 5 - Incomplete, but imo looks to have some decent potential
Round 6 - Prince, impressive so far, needed a back up RT for the future
Round 7 - Cox/Gaskin - not looking too hot either, but factor in Mark Walton and we potentially got a steal in the 7th or later which is ALWAYS a win.
Probably not a great class, but still incomplete due to the upcoming 2nd and the return of Van Ginkel which could make it quite good.
Grier already has a great draft class to his name, 2016 which he deserves FULL credit for.
Grier has a keen eye for talent and is heading this team in the right direction, meanwhile in Philly superstar GM Howie Roseman got his a** kissed all off-season, but has the second oldest roster in the NFL and his inability to draft well is KILLING the team and destroying their Superbowl window lmfao.
Go Nats!!!
That was said by absolutely nobody.You guys are worried about Grier because he can't draft OL?
Calm down, everyone on this site tells me OL doesn't matter anyway, because Tua will make the OL look better than they are and will immediately make us a contender by year two
That was said by absolutely nobody.
Also never said by anybody. A bad OL is an excuse in order to actually perform at some competent level, which is absolutely true. Whether that leads to wins or not depends on the rest of the talent on the team.Not in those words, but a bad OL is called an 'excuse' if a QB can't deliver wins
Fitz's sack % is right at his career average behind this o-line. Rosen's % is higher than Tannehil's was at any point during his career. O-line sucks, but QB makes a big difference.Also never said by anybody. A bad OL is an excuse in order to actually perform at some competent level, which is absolutely true. Whether that leads to wins or not depends on the rest of the talent on the team.
It's why Fitz has less than HALF the sack rate of Rosen in about the same number of snaps. There were TOOOOOONS of people saying, "How can we expect Rosen to look good when we have a historically bad Oline!?!?!?!?!"
Yup, which is why the excuses for Rosen being horrible were so infuriating.Fitz's sack % is right at his career average behind this o-line. Rosen's % is higher than Tannehil's was at any point during his career. O-line sucks, but QB makes a big difference.
Grier Groper knows what it means
Look on the bright side though. Grier is going to stock your roster with another half dozen of those early and often
Also never said by anybody. A bad OL is an excuse in order to actually perform at some competent level, which is absolutely true. Whether that leads to wins or not depends on the rest of the talent on the team.
It's why Fitz has less than HALF the sack rate of Rosen in about the same number of snaps. There were TOOOOOONS of people saying, "How can we expect Rosen to look good when we have a historically bad Oline!?!?!?!?!"