I think you should seek professional help your love obsession of Tannehill is not healthy man!
Oh Darn, Another Thill Thread! Just A Few Points I Wish People Could Be Honest About....
- Thread starter LoneStarPhin
- Start date
I think you should seek professional help your love obsession of Tannehill is not healthy man!
Save the condescending douche remark, please. If you think the Tannehill pro/con posts are AT ALL relevant then you must be the one who is new. You are going to have people on both sides of the topic, so your whole point in #1 is people complaining about a timeline... whether he played for 4 or played for 6, the tenure has been all Tannehill, by technicality, and... it CHANGES NOTHING. That's why it wasn't worth addressing. But alas, here I am addressing it.
Glad you agreed that you were wrong on #5 and could see the point I was making - maybe' you're not as douchey as you came off with that first comment
2 words...bigger picture. You seriously not
Another fact you forgot. One of the most sacked QBs in Phins history. If you think that's also on Tannehill then I'm blocking your comments because you don't have a friggin clue. There's another fact for you right there. Bank it. Get some balance with your comments. Otherwise I see it as your comments as being biased. I want a better QB but I see the bigger picture. Not a huge Tanny fan but you need to stop the obvious hate as it's pointless and not condusive to the positive waves our favourite team is showing lately.
Save the condescending douche remark, please. If you think the Tannehill pro/con posts are AT ALL relevant then you must be the one who is new. You are going to have people on both sides of the topic, so your whole point in #1 is people complaining about a timeline... whether he played for 4 or played for 6, the tenure has been all Tannehill, by technicality, and... it CHANGES NOTHING. That's why it wasn't worth addressing. But alas, here I am addressing it.
Glad you agreed that you were wrong on #5 and could see the point I was making - maybe' you're not as douchey as you came off with that first comment
I have my moments. But "that's not worth addressing" doesn't exactly come off as the *opposite* of douchey.
??? The post you quoted attempted to draw attention to OTHER parts of the team. I'm pretty sure the obsession with Tannehill is with the #QBwinz crowd.
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2010
- Messages
- 1,551
- Reaction score
- 2,910
1 season with a legit head coach or play calling. Philbin was garbage, the line has been garbage, Sherman was garbage and lazor was garbage. all are out of the league, much like the WRs tannehill carried as dead weight or being horrible somewhere else like philbin.
He didn't play last year. He has 4.75 years worth of experience, not 7. You people only say that to sound like your opinion is more valid when the detractors that want to ditch RT17 at all cost are really just low football IQ fans.
He didn't play last year. He has 4.75 years worth of experience, not 7. You people only say that to sound like your opinion is more valid when the detractors that want to ditch RT17 at all cost are really just low football IQ fans.
LoneStarPhin
Active Roster
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Messages
- 1,565
- Reaction score
- 1,712
dejesus:
wrong. the Fact I stated is that most of us are Not still waiting for his breakout season.
that did in fact happen in 2016, whether the minority who dont get it agree or not.
your "average" incorporates the first 5 games where the team was learning the new staff/system.
his "breakout" was after that, when he had a 100+ rating and was playing at a top 3-5 level. it was ended only by
injury.
that was the very definition of a breakout, and i think thats why most recognize it. there will always be ones like you, though. see you in the Fall (most likely the first few games back from his injury- after that i imagine you'll be too busy to weigh in on how good our O looks.)
wrong. the Fact I stated is that most of us are Not still waiting for his breakout season.
that did in fact happen in 2016, whether the minority who dont get it agree or not.
your "average" incorporates the first 5 games where the team was learning the new staff/system.
his "breakout" was after that, when he had a 100+ rating and was playing at a top 3-5 level. it was ended only by
injury.
that was the very definition of a breakout, and i think thats why most recognize it. there will always be ones like you, though. see you in the Fall (most likely the first few games back from his injury- after that i imagine you'll be too busy to weigh in on how good our O looks.)
roy_miami
2020 cant get here soon enough
If thats the definition then Moore "broke out" in 2016 also.
If Matt Moore could sustain a high level of play for any length of time, he wouldn't be sitting home right now. Or, is he part of the "great Tannehill conspiracy"?
roy_miami
2020 cant get here soon enough
Yeah he "broke out" and now he's sitting at home.
Just how exactly did Matt Moore “break out” playing ok / decent in a couple of games and then getting clobbered in the play offs?
Well, only you think he "broke out". So, that's pretty telling about your ability to evaluate QBs. Combined with your ability to evaluate head coaches, I'd say it explains a lot.
roy_miami
2020 cant get here soon enough
I don't know. People are throwing around language like football illiterate if you didn't see that Tannehill "broke out" so what's the official definition? By many measures Moore was playing at a top 5 level but now you're saying that is not it. So what is it? Who are all the QBs that have "broken out?"
roy_miami
2020 cant get here soon enough
No, he "broke out" according to the guys definition that I quoted. I disagree with his definition.