- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 10,397
- Reaction score
- 13,284
Another troll-rific thread...
Oh Darn, Another Thill Thread! Just A Few Points I Wish People Could Be Honest About....
- Thread starter LoneStarPhin
- Start date
Purely an argument over number of games, which is why I said that if Moore could sustain that level of play, he wouldn't be home.
Tannehill did it for 8 games. How long does he have to play at a top 10 level before you'll give him credit? Let's just get that out in the open. Full season? 2 seasons? 10 seasons? How many?
MiamiDolfan85
DA M.I.A IS WHERE I STAY
Look, the vision for this team is becoming more and more clear. Biggest thing I struggled with this off-season.
I have no gripes about going into the season with Ryan, just only whose behind him.
I still, to this moment, do not like what's behind him. Matt Moore earned some credibility in that role, but I don't see that in Brock or Fales.
I just think that's a risky bet, & one I don't agree with.
I have no gripes about going into the season with Ryan, just only whose behind him.
I still, to this moment, do not like what's behind him. Matt Moore earned some credibility in that role, but I don't see that in Brock or Fales.
I just think that's a risky bet, & one I don't agree with.
Classic roy
lurking
Club Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2007
- Messages
- 12,685
- Reaction score
- 16,869
It's called, let's be a d--k just to be a d--k.
roy_miami
2020 cant get here soon enough
Good question. Alex Smith "broke out" and played at a higher level than Tannehill and sustained longer, over a whole season. Did it change the way I view him? Not in the slightest. Not saying I would never change my view of him but its highly unlikely. So while I can give credit for good stretches I just don't have any faith in it going forward.
Well there it is. Finally admits that all the discussion was bullshit. It never was about what Tannehill did or what he can become. Roy had made up his mind and nothing else matters. Thanks. Now I can ignore everything you post about Tannehill because you just admitted it is bullshit.
roy_miami
2020 cant get here soon enough
Of course I made up my mind. Who the hell hasn't made up their mind after 7 years?
He did it for 8 games? Or for 4 games? Might want to check again
LoneStarPhin
Active Roster
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Messages
- 1,565
- Reaction score
- 1,712
Roy just trying to be a tool ( (why would anyone purposely want that?).
No, Moore didnt "break out" by any definition (and certainly not mine). more like he kind of flamed out.
RT on other hand was at the top of his game when his season was ended.
we get it, you dont. bye.
No, Moore didnt "break out" by any definition (and certainly not mine). more like he kind of flamed out.
RT on other hand was at the top of his game when his season was ended.
we get it, you dont. bye.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2006
- Messages
- 140
- Reaction score
- 165
I consider myself undecided on this issue, but Ryan's our QB so I support him 100% and I hope he has a great season.
For those of you on the "convinced" side, though, I would love to be swayed over to your side. So what I need is to know what happened in Baltimore during his breakout stretch. Because the media (which I know, doesn't know anything) just talked about how we beat inferior competition during that streak and teams with losing records. They all said the test would come vs. the Ravens (who were only 6-5 at the time...we were 7-4)...and then Tannehill was awful in that game...3 picks and down 24-0 before we score in garbage time. Why should I not be concerned by that game when everyone said that would be his big test? Given the tensions on this topic, I'm not sure that there can be a reasonable discussion, but I'm really curious.
For those of you on the "convinced" side, though, I would love to be swayed over to your side. So what I need is to know what happened in Baltimore during his breakout stretch. Because the media (which I know, doesn't know anything) just talked about how we beat inferior competition during that streak and teams with losing records. They all said the test would come vs. the Ravens (who were only 6-5 at the time...we were 7-4)...and then Tannehill was awful in that game...3 picks and down 24-0 before we score in garbage time. Why should I not be concerned by that game when everyone said that would be his big test? Given the tensions on this topic, I'm not sure that there can be a reasonable discussion, but I'm really curious.
The 7-1 stretch had him playing at a level near the top of the league.
Thought record didn’t mean anything for a QB? November he played at a high level. The other 4 games was average.
When making up your mind includes ignoring changes and progress, it is a problem. Most people understand that. Kind of sad that it needs to be explained to you.
This mentality explains a lot really. You're not the only one who has it, just the one who has come out and admitted it. It is what causes posters to claim all kinds of stuff that happened in the past as present tense. Once you've made up their mind, in. your own words - you're "highly unlikely to change your view". So we get repeated bullshit like, he gets a lot passes batted down, he hold onto the ball too long, he locks onto one receiver, he can't throw the long ball, etc. All despite improvements in all those areas (in some cases, improvement to top 5 status). Ignore that because you've made up your mind.
Well, when you made your mind up at the end of 2013 and you choose to ignore everything that has happened since, this is what you get.
(and again with AFTER SEVEN years. How can it be AFTER SEVEN years when he was drafted SIX years ago?) You've closed your mind to what has happened and started making up your own facts. Nice.
LOL. He had a 124 rating in a game in December. Passer rating of 98 with a YPA of 8 in the last two games in October.
For the 8 games, he had a passer rating over 100. When the hell did that become average?