Statistics don't lie.In fact it does. It takes into account that Gase consistently takes bottom-of-the-league rosters and has them competitive. He made the playoffs with that travesty of a roster in 2016 and had the 2017 and 2018 rosters in play for the playoffs well into December despite glaring holes all over the place and a backup QB playing most of those games.
The difference is you’re looking at box scores and final standings and basing your decision there while I’m actually looking at what happened in those seasons.
Personally, I think Gase is a good coach and his teams consistently overperforming their talent level supports that. I think it sucks that he keeps being handed these teams with no depth behind the starters and being forced to hire defensive coordinators he didn’t want because it saves the owner a few bucks. But despite those handicaps, he fields competitive teams and he doesn’t lay blame on anyone publicly. But my opinion doesn’t matter, nor does yours. We’ll see what the new VP thinks.
Look at team rankings. Bottom of the league.
Look at point differential. His first season was OK, with another coach's players. Two years ago -112. This year will end up @-100.
Look at his record against teams over .500.
There is literally no meaningful statistical category that would indicate improvement, or even competence.
Post some numbers, and prove that statement is in error.