CoryMatthews
☠️ Banned ☠️
2012 also....Over 1800 yards rushing in both 2014 and 2016.
2012 also....Over 1800 yards rushing in both 2014 and 2016.
In Brissetts last 17 starts (all the starts in his career) he has 2 300 yard games, In Tannehills last 17 starts he has had 0.
So let me get this straight, in the thread about the Dolphins tanking 2/3 of the posters in there said that we should get Brissett if we want to tank.In Brissetts last 17 starts (all the starts in his career) he has 2 300 yard games, In Tannehills last 17 starts he has had 0.
So much in there.First off I never said Tannehill was lesser than Brissett or Glennon, I said at the time Glennon got his 3/45 from Chicago and Brissett before he was traded and even now . . . .they were better options for teams to give up a better asset than for Ryan Tannehill today on his current deal.
Truth is its probably a smart thing for you to continue ignoring the issue at hand . . . .which is potential buyers of Ryan Tannehill in the trade market . . . .this undeniable aura that teams must feel for this guy if Miami officially puts him on the trade block and the no brainer compensation we are theoretically getting for this talent.
Just point us in the right direction because all of this back and forth about what hindered Ryan Tannehill can be searched for on this site by putting the date range from 2012 to 2019.
You are a good poster but you either fail or refuse to realize the Tannhill is no more than a variable to me at this point in regards to this discussion. If you wanna take it back to preinjury or hell his draft profile and “his potential” . . . .by all means keep doing you. GMs have 90 games of tape to see his greatness for themselves.
But Jacksonville is not racing to turnover their $21 million dollar cap hit for Bortles for an over 30, injury prone, newly discarded, not respected, 90 games but hasn’t done ****, coach killing, player turnover quarterback named Ryan Tannehill . . . .increasing that cap hit to over $35 million after the dead Bortles hit. . . .AND giving Miami anything worth a damn from a draft pick compensation.
Its not a fixation of the cap, its understanding that Ryan Tannehill is not the guy to blow your cap budget on from a positional standpoint or give up anything decent from a draft pick perspective.
Ryan’s best shot is with Cincy because of the Taylor connection and the lack of a dead cap hit from the Dalton contract.
Or staying here.
First off I never said Tannehill was lesser than Brissett or Glennon, I said at the time Glennon got his 3/45 from Chicago and Brissett before he was traded and even now . . . .they were better options for teams to give up a better asset than for Ryan Tannehill today on his current deal.
Truth is its probably a smart thing for you to continue ignoring the issue at hand . . . .which is potential buyers of Ryan Tannehill in the trade market . . . .this undeniable aura that teams must feel for this guy if Miami officially puts him on the trade block and the no brainer compensation we are theoretically getting for this talent.
Just point us in the right direction because all of this back and forth about what hindered Ryan Tannehill can be searched for on this site by putting the date range from 2012 to 2019.
You are a good poster but you either fail or refuse to realize the Tannhill is no more than a variable to me at this point in regards to this discussion. If you wanna take it back to preinjury or hell his draft profile and “his potential” . . . .by all means keep doing you. GMs have 90 games of tape to see his greatness for themselves.
But Jacksonville is not racing to turnover their $21 million dollar cap hit for Bortles for an over 30, injury prone, newly discarded, not respected, 90 games but hasn’t done ****, coach killing, player turnover quarterback named Ryan Tannehill . . . .increasing that cap hit to over $35 million after the dead Bortles hit. . . .AND giving Miami anything worth a damn from a draft pick compensation.
Its not a fixation of the cap, its understanding that Ryan Tannehill is not the guy to blow your cap budget on from a positional standpoint or give up anything decent from a draft pick perspective.
Ryan’s best shot is with Cincy because of the Taylor connection and the lack of a dead cap hit from the Dalton contract.
Or staying here.
I see 11/5/17 against Houston what's the other?In Brissetts last 17 starts (all the starts in his career) he has 2 300 yard games, In Tannehills last 17 starts he has had 0.
In Brissetts 17 starts he has more passing yardage than Tannehills last 17 starts. Tannehill has 27 tds compared to 13 for Brissett but 14 int compared to 7.also, Brissett has had 7 zero TD games out 17, never had more than 2 in a game. 13 TDs in 23 games is pretty bad, too
In Brissetts 17 starts he has more passing yardage than Tannehills last 17 starts. Tannehill has 27 tds compared to 13 for Brissett but 14 int compared to 7.
Tannehill also had a coach who’s only goal was to increase his qbs numbers (not actually win games)
Yeah, you've interpreted what Gase said incorrectly, which isn't surprising given the narrative you're so strongly pushing.
Sacrificing stats for wins. Not sacrificing wins for stats.
Doesn't matter how you frame it, 13 TDs in 17 starts is weak sauceIn Brissetts 17 starts he has more passing yardage than Tannehills last 17 starts. Tannehill has 27 tds compared to 13 for Brissett but 14 int compared to 7.
Tannehill also had a coach who’s only goal was to increase his qbs numbers (not actually win games)
Doesn't matter how you frame it, 13 TDs in 17 starts is weak sauce
I don’t listen to what the fraud actually says. You can tell by his actions, like 2017 when he ran a shovel pass from cutler to julius Thomas on the 2 yard line.
And the sacrificing stats for wins comment was garbage excuse making from the fraud.
So he's a fraud and Tannehill sucks, but the fraud and the crappy QB put up better numbers? I don't think you're being realistic here.