The grim reaper will be peeking at me in 8 years.Josh Rosen will be entering his prime in about 5 years, likely peaking in about 8 years.
Sometimes the old timers have it right, just saying.
The grim reaper will be peeking at me in 8 years.Josh Rosen will be entering his prime in about 5 years, likely peaking in about 8 years.
Sometimes the old timers have it right, just saying.
Were the "amazing" spurts only in college?
PS: Rosen wasn't cheap. He was a 2nd round pick where we bid against ourselves. This is a round where you can still nab guys like Xavien Howard.
That exact rhetoric is why we wasted 7 years on Tannehill.Just because QB's are starting earlier, doesn't mean that's the correct avenue to take.
The great Tom Brady was closer to being released then he was taking Bledsoe's job in the preseason of 2000.
Does anyone remember All-World Patrick Mahomes' 2017 season? Me either.
Josh Rosen will be entering his prime in about 5 years, likely peaking in about 8 years.
Sometimes the old timers have it right, just saying.
You guys kill me with the criticism of Rosen in his first week of TC. Rodgers spent 2 years on the bench behind Favre. Not all QBs are ready to start on Day 1. Scheme clearly matters along with how comfortable the QB is with his personnel.
Why everyone here is wishing for a 0-16 season after reading 5 days worth of tweets is hysterical. You'd rather write off a guy after a week and pray for another unproven QB like Tua or Herbert, but even if we do get them, they're going to need time too.
You're all ****ed in the head, but it's hilarious to read
I'd say, 'only looking at offseason reports to make a final judgement?!'That exact rhetoric is why we wasted 7 years on Tannehill.
Stop looking at the exceptions to make your argument rather than the endless amount of QBs who washed out of the league because from Day one until their last day they didn't show anything.
There's a big difference between a QB showing something but lacking consistency, and a guy who looks mediocre at best day after day after day. The latter will get you fired.
If Rosen comes out of the gate and has some amazing games and some garbage games, then I'll be on board for grooming him and giving him time, but an entire offseason of reports has him looking like Chad Henne. Is that worth the excuses?
That exact rhetoric is why we wasted 7 years on Tannehill.
Stop looking at the exceptions to make your argument rather than the endless amount of QBs who washed out of the league because from Day one until their last day they didn't show anything.
There's a big difference between a QB showing something but lacking consistency, and a guy who looks mediocre at best day after day after day. The latter will get you fired.
If Rosen comes out of the gate and has some amazing games and some garbage games, then I'll be on board for grooming him and giving him time, but an entire offseason of reports has him looking like Chad Henne. Is that worth the excuses?
I'm not making a final judgment at all, but let's stop pretending like he didn't have an entire year in the NFL prior to this offseason also looking like garbage.I'd say, 'only looking at offseason reports to make a final judgement?!'
This narrative that OF COURSE a guy with 14 years of sub-mediocre NFL performance is going to look better than your 2nd year elite franchise level QB hopeful...has to be my favorite.
Quick...How about the Chargers drafting Philip Rivers because they weren't sold on Brees? Or Jimmy Johnson giving up a first rounder to get Steve Walsh in the supplemental draft because he had concluded Aikman was a loser and always would be. Those guys turned out alright. I want to see Rosen in real games against NFL players from another team, behind a line that gives him some half-decent protection.
I'm not making a final judgment at all, but let's stop pretending like he didn't have an entire year in the NFL prior to this offseason also looking like garbage.
What I'm saying is that he's heading towards bust territory faster than he's showing signs of being the franchise quarterback the Dolphins were taking a shot on. Is that really sacrilege or has nobody learned their lesson from Tannehill?
Bust? He's yet to play a game for the Dolphins. You've made your mind up on him already so you love this narrative out of TC.I'm not making a final judgment at all, but let's stop pretending like he didn't have an entire year in the NFL prior to this offseason also looking like garbage.
What I'm saying is that he's heading towards bust territory faster than he's showing signs of being the franchise quarterback the Dolphins were taking a shot on. Is that really sacrilege or has nobody learned their lesson from Tannehill?
You have to ignore some poster sometimes. I like @AZStryker but sometimes he gets a little giddy and excitable.
Just a few things IMHO as I read through this thread. #1, you guys are WAYYYYY overblowing the not identifying the Mike LB, as in many offenses the center does this and Pouncey use to do it a lot. Also Rosen is 22 years old going into his second year in a brand new offense/team. You are comparing him to a dude that has 15 years on NFL experience and almost 200 TDs thrown under his belt. He has good charisma and has been liked by players everywhere he plays because he is very loose. He has played good to amazing in spurts of his career. So for anyone thinking Rosen should be closer at this point, man PLEASE!
I actually like this approach to Rosen as he was selected in the first round for a reason. However, we have and have had MAJOR OL issues to the point our OL coach just got canned. I am glad Fitzpatrick is out there right now because he can handle what is going on right now better than Rosen can at this point of his career. This is a good opportunity for Rosen to learn from a Vet who has seen a lot, not only on how to play the position....but also how to deal with people.
Give Rosen some time, and don't throw him to the wolves like he was in AZ....we don't have to do that. We got him on the cheap and he has time to develop to see what we have or maybe don't have. ANYONE who thinks he should be on the same level as Fitz right now, really needs to take a look at the bigger picture here as to where both players are in their careers.
Touché! Though I just can’t get behind starting a guy who gets us further from being competitive in the future. We all know what Fitz is, a replacement level qb. He won’t make it through the entire season based on his play anyway, so why postpone the inevitable? Just for fun we’ll play devil’s advocate. Even if Fitz does somehow avoid getting the hook and miraculously leads us to 8-8, isn’t that a worst case scenario? Now all these picks go towards moving up instead of building the team.
My goal, and hopefully the team’s goal, is to have an absolute concrete understanding of Josh Rosen. If they can do that in training camp practices fine, but then I have to wonder about their due diligence in evaluating him before we shipped out a 2nd rounder as these negative reports are all concerns that have been around for a while.