The progressive in me loves the double-down strategy in each of these mocks. The conservative, however, is wagging finger at WR #51 when in prime territory for high-rated LB, RB.
Well... it's mock draft time.
- Thread starter Feverdream
- Start date
If either draft happens I’ll get a tattoo in tribute to Grier.
That would be a heck of a draft/ You add Duncan and Vorhees and Durham to the Oline, and that late in the draft, and then Tyjae and keep Mostert. That would be incredible.
Feverdream
Club Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2003
- Messages
- 15,693
- Reaction score
- 40,537
I usually stay away from doing much trading in these mocks, as you never know how close the offers match the real ones, but in this one, I went into it with the idea that I wanted to add picks if I missed on Sanders and Gibbs-- which I did. So, I ended up with 8 players instead of 5, and I think we may try to do this in the real draft since we are short resources. I compared my selections with the Tankathon mock draft for comparison purposes.
77. Jack Campbell MLB - (#72 at Tankathon)
78. Demarvion Overshown WLB - (4th round or below)
88. Luke Musgrave TE - (#55)
105. Mike Morris DE - (4th round or below)
131. Kenny McIntosh RB - (4th round or below)
161. DJ Turner CB - (#88)
165. Julius Brents CB - (4th round or below
178. Luke Shoonmaker TE - (4th round or below)
...and no, I don't really think that some of these guys will fall this far, but I guess that you never really know.
77. Jack Campbell MLB - (#72 at Tankathon)
78. Demarvion Overshown WLB - (4th round or below)
88. Luke Musgrave TE - (#55)
105. Mike Morris DE - (4th round or below)
131. Kenny McIntosh RB - (4th round or below)
161. DJ Turner CB - (#88)
165. Julius Brents CB - (4th round or below
178. Luke Shoonmaker TE - (4th round or below)
...and no, I don't really think that some of these guys will fall this far, but I guess that you never really know.
I think that would be a super solid draft
Feverdream
Club Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2003
- Messages
- 15,693
- Reaction score
- 40,537
With only having 44 players under contract right now... there are probably 15 players who will make our opening day line up who are not currently on our roster. We may have to concentrate on quantity over quality in this year's draft.
Not that I'd mind, I recommend trading down almost every year.
Feverdream
Club Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2003
- Messages
- 15,693
- Reaction score
- 40,537
Your mocks are almost a 180 from mine. I'm very content to run it back with our current group of linemen (and a cheap FA or two), and wait one more year to buy DBs early... It's going to be fun to see which way the team goes. There are gonna be a TON of arguments between now and then. LOL
Honeybadger08
Active Roster
NFL Mock Draft Simulator - Pro Football Network
Admiral Script Embed Example
NFL MOCK DRAFT SIMULATOR
LAST UPDATED ON 2/7/2023, 6:01:54 PM ET
-
51.
Drew Sanders
LB Arkansas
-
77.
Israel Abanikanda
RB Pittsburgh
-
84.
Andrew Vorhees
OG USC
-
178.
Daiyan Henley
LB Washington State
-
240.
Gabe Hall
DT Baylor
FULL RESULTS
START NEW SIM
Nice draft for LBNFL Mock Draft Simulator - Pro Football Network
Admiral Script Embed Example
NFL MOCK DRAFT SIMULATOR
LAST UPDATED ON 2/7/2023, 6:01:54 PM ET
51.
Drew Sanders
LB Arkansas
77.
Israel Abanikanda
RB Pittsburgh
84.
Andrew Vorhees
OG USC
178.
Daiyan Henley
LB Washington State
240.
Gabe Hall
DT Baylor
FULL RESULTS
START NEW SIM
DKphin
Club Member
51: R2 P20 LB Drew Sanders - Arkansas
77: R3 P14 RB Devon Achane - Texas A&M
84: R3 P21 OT Jaxson Kirkland - Washington
178: R6 P1 LB DeMarvion Overshown - Texas
240: R7 P21 CB Tyreke Johnson - Nebraska
77: R3 P14 RB Devon Achane - Texas A&M
84: R3 P21 OT Jaxson Kirkland - Washington
178: R6 P1 LB DeMarvion Overshown - Texas
240: R7 P21 CB Tyreke Johnson - Nebraska
Traded down a bit from one pick which resulted in moving up a good bit with the later pick
My thought process- another OT with some talent to develop for the future. TA will miss games, wanna have hope for AJ but who really knows. Just feel like it’s an okay move for the near future- a potential cheap contract for a possible starting OT.
The next two db’s - just felt like the talent that was there, it was the way to go. Most of the better Lbs were gone (I always hope drew sanders will fall - but just saw a mock the other day that has him as a top 10 pick!!) but Campbell and Pace were both gone, so that’s the way the cookie crumbles
The rb’s - Kinda taken a liking to McIntosh if we could get him later, sort of a do it all kinda guy. And then Mitchell is fast as hell, why not double dip with the 7th rounder and take a chance on that
Anyways I’d be stoked with this draft
honestly could go either way, I like your approach as well
My thought process- another OT with some talent to develop for the future. TA will miss games, wanna have hope for AJ but who really knows. Just feel like it’s an okay move for the near future- a potential cheap contract for a possible starting OT.
The next two db’s - just felt like the talent that was there, it was the way to go. Most of the better Lbs were gone (I always hope drew sanders will fall - but just saw a mock the other day that has him as a top 10 pick!!) but Campbell and Pace were both gone, so that’s the way the cookie crumbles
The rb’s - Kinda taken a liking to McIntosh if we could get him later, sort of a do it all kinda guy. And then Mitchell is fast as hell, why not double dip with the 7th rounder and take a chance on that
Anyways I’d be stoked with this draft
Can anyone explain the trading process when using pff’s site?? Pff is super user friendly