Well, maybe on face value sure.
But when you look at actual numbers not so much.
Since Howard has decided to tell the world Byron Jones was overpaid and he deserves more money than him. Let's compare the two from 2016-2019. I don't count 2020 because Howard's beef was them making Jones a higher paid CB prior to last season. So this is to see if Howard has. Legitimate gripe.
Jones- 63 games played
Howard- 39 games played
Jones- Targeted 270 times
Howard- 210 times
During that time
Jones- targeted 4.3 times a game
Howard- targeted 5.3 times a game
During that time, it's clear teams targeted Howard more implying QBS stayed away from Jones more. Remember, this is also with Jones playing 24 more games which actually makes his stats that more impressive.
Jones- 160 catches allowed
Howard- 116 catches allowed
Jones- 59% completion against
Howard- 54% completion against.
That one is a slight victory to Howard.
Now to dispel the "red flag" comment.
Jones- 219 tackles
Howard- 116
Jones- 59 more tackles than receptions allowed.
Howard- 5 more tackles than receptions allowed.
You say red flag, others can say he is always around the ball and is more complete player. He doesn't just cover WRS like Howard. All Howard does is cover, he seems to not be involved unless it's his guy.
So far looks to me like they are pretty equal. Jones actually statistically was more reliable and a more overall player.
If Howard was a shut down corner, Jones was too. It wasn't a "single" very good season.
With all that said, Howard was CLEARLY the better playmaker.
Jones- 4 total turnovers caused
Howard- 13 total turnovers caused
Impressive considering 24 less games.
So in essence, the team paid a CB with similar "shut down" numbers, stats and capability, who on average, played 5 + more games a season, but was not the playmaker as Howard.
Levi Wallace? He appeared to be on Howard's level, minus the play making ability, but slightly superior in almost every other category.