shellgh0st
D-Unit
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2005
- Messages
- 547
- Reaction score
- 0
enigmatics said:Nah, the guy who created the thread in which "Ronnie was a bust" could be coined a hater. I merely spoke on my disappointment in Ronnie's dancing and ability to hit the hole early on in the year when Caddy was showing that he could come in and do it right away. That's no hatership, that's fact, Caddy was tearing it up. But as the weeks progressed Ronnie started showing the same and I attested to that. However it was never a matter of the bad case of hater that you're suffering from, just a case of impatience.
Your feelings have no relevance to the argument at hand. You cannot simply discredit all that Quinn's showns simply because "you feel" a certain way. There's no factual substance to back any of that up. Besides, you never gave any indication about what it is exactly about Weis's system that could perhaps make a QB look better than he actually is - especially the author of this thread. It's a joke. Anytime arguments like this are brought up, people continue to utilize that same lame form of generalizing.
If you actually paid attention to Quinn, broke him down by watching his mechanics, footwork, pocket awareness, etc. etc. you'd see one helluva QB. So let me hear this, if the man were to go back to school next year and continue on with his stellar performance would he still be just a "product" of the system he plays in?
I'm sorry, but it defies all logic that (if he came out) he'd be a top 10 pick because of the system he played in. You actually have to have talent, a wealth of it at that, to get drafted that high.
First, IMO, you are a RB HATER (that has now jumped on the bandwagon).
Next, I wasn't arguing a side. I was giving an opinion on how I FELT. And made that CLEAR. So I don't need to provide facts.
I didn't say 'Quinn sucks' and then instead of providing facts I said 'and thats how I feel'. What I said is, I have a strong FEELING he is a product of the system. And stated why I had that feeling in my original post.
Get it? Is that beyond you?
P.S. If you don't like the context in which that discussion is taking place, you don't have to reply to my post. Which clearly pointed out, that my opinion was based on a FEELING I had.