Lisle Phin Fan
☠️ Banned ☠️
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2007
- Messages
- 144
- Reaction score
- 0
:confused:
What? Which players were you talking about?
you answer my question first
:confused:
What? Which players were you talking about?
you answer my question first
dude,your killing me... its not that he cant come from ND its that HE (quinn) is not the guy. But if you really want to know, I guess Mirer,Powlus and that whole bunch did not get too good playing those tough Army games. So no, aside from Joe montana I cant remember the last ND qb to make it after him. let it go already... quinns not going to be the man down here.
dude,your killing me... its not that he cant come from ND its that HE (quinn) is not the guy. But if you really want to know, I guess Mirer,Powlus and that whole bunch did not get too good playing those tough Army games. So no, aside from Joe montana I cant remember the last ND qb to make it after him. let it go already... quinns not going to be the man down here.
:confused:
What? Which players were you talking about?
I have no problem thinking he shouldnt be our pick, but why his school was the deciding factor was odd to me. And just because you say he wont be the man down here it suddenly becomes gospel and we all should think like you do?
Darius Walker
Rhema McKnight
Dan Santucci
Ryan Harris
None of those players were overwhelmingly good. Quinn was far and away the best player on that team. I know ND is consistently overrated, but without Quinn they would have only been viewed as a top 25 team(not top 10), and that still would have been an overrated team.
I don't understand why everyone states Quinn suffered from a lack of talent on the offensive side of the ball. Smarzidja and Mcknight made a fine pair of college receivers, and Darius Walker had back to back 1200 yard seasons. I do know that the offensive line wasn't great.
Here's the thing though...look at the teams ND played. It's not like Cutler, with his lack of talent, going up against LSU, UF, Tennessee, etc every week. ND was far more talented than all but three teams they played, those being Michigan, USC, and LSU.
I guess what I'm trying to say is...it doesn't matter how talented your team is as long as it is more talented than your opponents.
my point was that they had much more talent that Michigan State and Stanford
its like herding cats
I don't understand why everyone states Quinn suffered from a lack of talent on the offensive side of the ball. Smarzidja and Mcknight made a fine pair of college receivers, and Darius Walker had back to back 1200 yard seasons. I do know that the offensive line wasn't great.
Here's the thing though...look at the teams ND played. It's not like Cutler, with his lack of talent, going up against LSU, UF, Tennessee, etc every week. ND was far more talented than all but three teams they played, those being Michigan, USC, and LSU.
I guess what I'm trying to say is...it doesn't matter how talented your team is as long as it is more talented than your opponents.
So what if they had more talent?
Oklahoma had more talent than Boise State. That doesn't mean you always play up to your talent as a team, or that you have the better coached team.
I really don't understand the herding cats remark. :confused: