Vegas released over under on win totals. Miami is tied for last with Arizona at 5. LETS GO.
I saw that. I’ll nervously bet the under on both.
Vegas released over under on win totals. Miami is tied for last with Arizona at 5. LETS GO.
Still waiting ... ... .... ... ...
Anything to "to SUGGEST that we aren’t tanking" [emphasis mine]
Trying to resign James when there was a cheaper/worse RT on the roster.
Resigning Parker when they have cheaper guys, just as bad, on the roster.
Signing RF when there were cheaper/worse options.
Wilson and Grant, two players who can possibly win games, are still on the roster.
Some were arguing "tanking" meant cutting all but a "core" group of players. To date, Tunsil, Kilgore, Wilson, Parker, Drake, Stills, O'Leary, and some others on O. On D, Harris, Godchaux, Taylor, KA, Baker, McMillan, X, McCain, Fitz, TJM, (essentially the entire back 7) and others. That's not much turnover. I'm not going to say NO tank, but, to date, the signals are mixed. What IS certain is those underperforming, but being paid as if underperforminng are gone (with a couple of exceptions).
Let go of our 2nd and 3rd best olineman (James and Sitton)
Let go of our two best pass rushers (Wake and Quinn)
Let go of our most consistent player on offense (Gore)
Traded our QB with Falk and Fales on the roster at the time
Let Amendola go
Larsen gone
Branch gone
We replaced with
Rowe: Depth
Allen: not even sure
Fitzmagic: Starter
Chris Reed: Not even sure
On our trades. We got 2020 picks.
We arent worried about winning in 2019. I can guarantee you that.
Let go of our 2nd and 3rd best olineman (James and Sitton)
Let go of our two best pass rushers (Wake and Quinn)
Let go of our most consistent player on offense (Gore)
Traded our QB with Falk and Fales on the roster at the time
Let Amendola go
Larsen gone
Branch gone
We replaced with
Rowe: Depth
Allen: not even sure
Fitzmagic: Starter
Chris Reed: Not even sure
On our trades. We got 2020 picks.
We arent worried about winning in 2019. I can guarantee you that.
Where are the actions that suggest we are trying to win? Again if you aren’t trying to win you are in what - lose modeThe problem is rev wanted actions that SUGGEST a tank is no a lock - not actions that DISPROVE a tank. I provided those. And, as you know, there are quite a few who don't see Sitton, Quinn, Gore, Larsen, and branch leaving as proof of anything other than dumping contracts or building cap. No one will argue dropping Larsen, Branch, and Quinn will cause any appreciable loss. Certainly I agree, I see no proof Flores is going all in to win as many games as possible, but that gets us back to the unfruitful debate on tank v. rebuild.
Any action they are trying to win against the Pats would be helpful at this pointSo you judge the direction of the team every year before the draft???
Excellent!
Dont hold your breath :nuke:
Where are the actions that suggest we are trying to win? Again if you aren’t trying to win you are in what - lose mode
Where are the actions that suggest we are trying to win? Again if you aren’t trying to win you are in what - lose mode
So if you are not trying to win you are trying to tie?