Feverdream
Club Member
Heh! Straw man alert.I like how taking the time to establish that Tua performed better than some choose to paint the picture is, to you, embarrassing. God forbid that someone takes the time to isolate how he isn't the trash that Simms, Omar, Florio, and the Co-owner of PFF Colinsworth want to pretend he is. he was a rookie. We all need to just let his second-year play out. If we're true fans we want him to succeed. He is after all the QB of the Dolphins.
Regarding the descent into grammar police comments, come on people. It's a football fan site.
No, taking the time to blah blah blah... embarrassing... is not even close to what I was commenting on. If this particular writer had just made the point that Tua's season was statistically better than many previous rookies, and then said that these other PARTICULAR ANALYSTS were wrong (in his opinion), then that would have been fine. Indeed, I would have mostly agreed with him, but that isn't what he did-- at all.
Instead, he conflated these four or five guys and called them 'the media', rather than a subset of analysts... and then, he said that they were 'lying' rather than just wrong, or had an alternate opinion than his own. He tried to turn the entire thing into some sort of tribalism (something you seem to have swallowed-- hook line and sinker).
There was no 'the media' here. There are a few analysts that disagree with you. And btw... there is a difference between journalists and analysts. If a written or spoken word piece has analysis, then it is essentially an opinion piece, and one way to determine if a news organization is worth a damn is determining where they put their analysis and/or commentary. If it is on the front page (or during prime time hours), you can generally just laugh off the entire network as biased-- especially if all of their opinions agree with one another.
As far as grammar police go... That was not my commentary. However, poor grammar is usually a sign of a low education and overall lack of sophistication. Not always, but it shades in that direction. When poor grammar, lack of proper paragraphing, and wrong word errors creep into a supposedly professional piece, it is even worse. This usually shows that the network itself has sloppy editorial standards and that pieces are improperly reviewed before publication.