It's a typo. I'm actually a great speller but good deflection.
I wouldn't expect someone as knowledgable as you to get the irony of your post.
It's a typo. I'm actually a great speller but good deflection.
If, if, if. If henne led them to 2 more wins you'd be in the playoffs.
I am here to educate, especially posters like you who barely know if a football is pumped w/ air or stuffed w/ feathers. You are here for some comedy(although those photoshops get boring after a while). I am here to talk football. You can choose to pay attention and learn or attack me, you choose to attack and you don't acquire more knowledge. Too bad for you.
I rest my case. You're here to educamate us that Namath is HOF-worthy while JT isn't, and that 11-5 Divisional Championship isn't more impressive and deserving than a 7-7-2 record where the jest lost more divisional games than they won ?? How very haughty, pretentious, not to mention delusional of you.
You're about as football savvy as a flickering 40-WATT bulb. Actually I suspect your 12 thousand posts belittling the Fins and aggrandizing or defending the Jest speak to an underlying OCD where you're afflicted by an unsettling sense of unease and discordance when there are people who know more than you but don't agree with your view of the world. Seek help. Try to give FH up for Lent at the least.
Tom Brady played 16 games, uh oh. He won 10 of them. Last year Cassel won 11. Therefore, you can't call our title a fluke because Brady didn't play. When we played Brady the first time, we pounded them by 25 points. Brady wouldn't have made the difference. Miami still would've made the playoffs if Brady had played.This is the point. if you ever bothered reading and absorbing the info you'd know how overrated I think Joe Namath is.
We were 9-7 and our 9-7 is as impressive as your 11-5 last year b/c the sched was more difficult this year and Tom Brady played 16 games. You guys were impressive last year and I gave you guys credit but a sore loser like you can't give our team any credit.
I don't just come here and atatck the Phins, I back up my opinions. I'm sorry if you can't handle the truth.
Tom Brady played 16 games, uh oh. He won 10 of them. Last year Cassel won 11. Therefore, you can't call our title a fluke because Brady didn't play. When we played Brady the first time, we pounded them by 25 points. Brady wouldn't have made the difference. Miami still would've made the playoffs if Brady had played.
he did'nt have to look to far...it's hanging on his bedroom wall :hi5:How much time did you actually invest in Googling an image that would fit your smack talk?
The Jets wouldn't have even sniffed the playoffs had we started Kellen Clemens back there. So Sanchez has some to do with the Jets making the playoffs, it just is more obvious in some games.
This is the point. if you ever bothered reading and absorbing the info you'd know how overrated I think Joe Namath is.
We were 9-7 and our 9-7 is as impressive as your 11-5 last year b/c the sched was more difficult this year and Tom Brady played 16 games. You guys were impressive last year and I gave you guys credit but a sore loser like you can't give our team any credit.
I don't just come here and atatck the Phins, I back up my opinions. I'm sorry if you can't handle the truth.
This is what makes vaark brilliant! Even if he's wrong, he will trick you into thinking you're wrong with the way he talks. You gotta ove vaark. The dude spits out facts like there's no tomorrow.You think you back up your opinions. Big difference!
You caught Brady in the 2nd game when he was gunshy and scared to take a hit. Hell the game before, Buffalo should have beaten him. You would have caught him later and you wouldn't have split. You lost 60% of your divisional games and caught teams early in the season like the Titans on their downswings whereas we caught them in the middle of a 6-2 run. We outplayed NO and lost; NO outplayed you and you lost. We own you: 3 out of the last 4.
For you to tell me that you're smart and I'm dumb because I don't see that a 7-7 team with 2 season ending laydowns is more impressive than a 11-5 divisional champion one that pioneered an innovative offense, well Junk, that just confirms my contention that you're full of yourself, and delusional if you sincerely believe that you're shedding light on us unwashed masses. I've spent years in a business where I've observed the disconnect between messages seemingly smart people thought they were sending versus the signals that were really being received and interpreted. You're a classic example, although I don't really think you sincerely believe whatyou claim. You need to take personal inventory before you continue to foist your subjective views and conveniently parsed self-serving opinions on people you feel have inferior knowledge to you. Really dude.
You think you back up your opinions. Big difference!
You caught Brady in the 2nd game when he was gunshy and scared to take a hit. Hell the game before, Buffalo should have beaten him. You would have caught him later and you wouldn't have split. You lost 60% of your divisional games and caught teams early in the season like the Titans on their downswings whereas we caught them in the middle of a 6-2 run. We outplayed NO and lost; NO outplayed you and you lost. We own you: 3 out of the last 4.
For you to tell me that you're smart and I'm dumb because I don't see that a 7-7 team with 2 season ending laydowns is more impressive than a 11-5 divisional champion one that pioneered an innovative offense, well Junk, that just confirms my contention that you're full of yourself, and delusional if you sincerely believe that you're shedding light on us unwashed masses. I've spent years in a business where I've observed the disconnect between messages seemingly smart people thought they were sending versus the signals that were really being received and interpreted. You're a classic example, although I don't really think you sincerely believe whatyou claim. You need to take personal inventory before you continue to foist your subjective views and conveniently parsed self-serving opinions on people you feel have inferior knowledge to you. Really dude.
This is what makes vaark brilliant! Even if he's wrong, he will trick you into thinking you're wrong with the way he talks. You gotta ove vaark. The dude spits out facts like there's no tomorrow.
He definitely played better this year BUT he didn't face pressure until the final weeks and he failed that test, sanchez had the pressure of starting day 1 and Henne had the luxury of sitting out a year+. I give Henne a higher grade this year(I was impresssed by henne) but I'm not changing how I feel going forward based on this year.
he can put up the better stats, Mark is still playing. Not many rookies start playoff games at QB.
For the sake of arguement, you called yourself very knowledgeable in a post on the last page.I always back up my opinions.
I never said we didn't catch any breaks this year but we beat the teams we needed to beat. Remember, we lost a bunch of heartbreakers inclduing 2 to you guys. We weren't some 3 win type team that got lucky and won 9.
I never called you dumb, I never said I was smart.
We were 9-7 not 7-7 and the sxched was MUCH easier a year ago. How come you don't bring up that the last 5 opponents you played were all dead teams? The bottom line is you beat the teams you need to beat, you did it last year and we did it this year. I'm not quite sure why this is so difficult to comprehend. A year ago I created a thread congratulating you guys on beating us and winning the division, this year you make a million excuses and can't stop whining.