Spesh
#freespesh
My point is that draft talent, even from the first round, is largely unknown. If I'm GM or head coach, I go with what I know as long as I can. I try to be as informed as I can be about the players I MUST choose from in the draft. But I don't beg to enter that crap shoot by using up quality/known talent in the process. The bottom line is that we all know there is no sure thing in the draft, especially from the 2nd round on down. Our history with the second round has proven that in spades over the past decade. To me, it makes far more sense to utilize and develop what we have and only enter the crap shoot that is the draft when its given to us. UNLESS, and its a big UNLESS, someone offers us compensation that's impossible to refuse. And the only thing , in my opinion, that's impossible to refuse, is an existing player who's performance is KNOWN to have matched or exceeded the player we are giving up AND we are given draft picks AND we have a need at the position being offered AND we are certain we can afford to give up a quality player at the position in question.
We are incompetant. There is no denying that. Other teams dont have problems consistently hitting on high draft picks. Its why teams like the Lions go from rags to riches while we stay hovering around mediocre. Im not sure where this myth came from that second round picks are a huge risk, but its absurd. In the previous CBA second round picks were coveted because they had the talent of first rounders(or close to it) without the finacial liability. Our history is what we should be trying to correct, not avoiding great value like the plague.
Where is it written in the annals of history that Reggie Bush is "known to perform"? He had 1 season of hitting the most basic marker for a running back. I am simply amazed that people are losing their minds over hitting 1k yards. Thats considered the bare minimum of being a successful back in this league, if you have less then a thousand yards you had a bad season. I suppose we have enough practice at throwing praise at mediocrity, but come on people.
It is very easy to refute the notion of "an existing player whos performance is known......" Its a coaches and GM's job to known when to unload players before they go on the downslide of their careers. The Eagles are BRILLIANT at getting the best value possible for players who can no longer hold up. If a player is "known to perform" is also entering a age where his decline is inevitable, i dont care what he did to get "known" you dump him for the best value possible. A 27 year old running back with a history of injuries who only had a single good season certainly fits that bill.
One of the major reasons why we havent had a winning season in over 3 years is because we havent gotten good value. Whether its over drafting players, missing on second round picks, signing crap players to huge contracts, or refusing to unload players as they reach their limit, its all about mismanagement of value. We should NOT look to continue this habit. We should NOT try to avoid second round picks just because the people in charge are idiots. What we should be doing is trying to bring in someone who can hit with those second round picks. We should be trying to emulate some of the best teams in the league.
Instead, we are seriously having a discussion concerning a aging player with a history of injuries who plays the most easily replacable position in football and whether we should really let him walk if we get offered a fortune.