dolphinheel
Active Roster
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2004
- Messages
- 5,861
- Reaction score
- 8,216
Hasn’t given up a sack in 2.5 yrs vs some of tge best PR in the country. He’ll do just fine
Your last two sentences should not be understated.Not sure if you are disagreeing with me or not but are making additional points to the point I am already making. The qb isn't suppose to telegraph where he is reading his passes but I'm sure you know that. I will say I will have to make some exceptions here with some qb's that drop back further than normal like Mahommes. My point is, the qb is suppose to get rid of the ball. Play's aren't designed to make the qb hold on to the ball forever. RPO, or any offense based on quick reading, or analytical reading. I mean, if tackle is defending against a defender rushing to the outside and the qb is in the pocket he won't be able to see them. If someone keeps getting beat, then the offense coordinator can choose to start calling shotgun plays, running the ball, or dropping back further. There isn't really anything set in stone but most people in here should get what we are saying.
"Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face..."
-Mike Tyson
The above quote is ready made for an instance like this. Our rook, is plug and play on Tua's blindside...ok, we shall see.
He saidI saw him box a few times and "tackle" would not be a miss-statement of how he would put a guy into the ropes. PO
Well he did get punched in the face in college and played a game with his eye swollen shut and didn't give up a sack in the rain.
I am just giving a train of thought not a guideline for protecting a qb, or writing a documentary on the blindside lol. But I agree with you about today's qb evolving. One QB that we can use as an example is Mahommes, probably the longest drop backs I seen ever.Your last two sentences should not be understated.
The blind side idea lost much of it's value when QBs evolved away from taking a substantial majority of snaps from behind center.
Shotgun, or even pistol, mitigates the blind spot to the point that it's not that huge of a factor. It's still a consideration, but not close to the extent it once was
there there....Did you pick up roses for me this morning Dan?
Yeah...he didn't give up a sack that game.Well he did get punched in the face in college and played a game with his eye swollen shut and didn't give up a sack in the rain.
Why are you so negative on the kid? Is it because the dolphins did not draft the player you want?I was never really impressed by him to the point where I'd be thankful to get him. I think that's a big reason why he didn't come out last year. He's the same guy from last year, IMO. They had a fairly mobile QB so the sack totals may be a tad bit misleading.
Overall, I can't say that I think he's a better RT than Hunt. If they out him there and his numbers are better...fine. If not, Hunt belongs back outside.
Longest drop backs....remind me the longest sack in SB history.I am just giving a train of thought not a guideline for protecting a qb, or writing a documentary on the blindside lol. But I agree with you about today's qb evolving. One QB that we can use as an example is Mahommes, probably the longest drop backs I seen ever.
only guy to drop back like that was fran tarkenton lolLongest drop backs....remind me the longest sack in SB history.
Negative...I didn't think so, but if anyone would know negative it would be you.Why are you so negative on the kid? Is it because the dolphins did not draft the player you want?
I don't care mobile QB, or a run heavy offense, when you don't have a sack in two and half years against top college programs, that saying something.
The whole nation think its a good pick, including posters here wanted Sewell. You are the only one who is negative.
Well hopefully we can keep ya around Ray